banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Everything Space Astronomy Clubs and Events Ask an Astronomer "neutron" star etc.
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 02, 2008, 05:52:49 AM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
December 02, 2008, 05:52:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: "neutron" star etc.  (Read 1046 times)
donmila
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« on: July 02, 2004, 01:24:01 AM »

I have once heard, many years ago, of stars, when they lose their fuel, or sometning, that they form into something callled a "neutron star". . .
just what is it, and what is the relationship, if any, to a "black hole"?

On the subject of black holes: Is it possible for the objec in question to gather enough material from the surrounding stars which the seem to cannibalize, to eventually become a light emitting sun again, and, repeat the process (for lack of a better anology, birth, light giving sun, super giant phase, collapse into a "black hole" ad infinitum....?
PS...I have a limited understanding of astronomical terms, so, try to keep it within the non technical language, if possible. Thanks. Donmila.
Orstio
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5854



WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2004, 01:34:02 AM »

This link should help you:

http://www.eclipse.net/~cmmiller/BH/blkmain.html

Quote
On the subject of black holes: Is it possible for the objec in question to gather enough material from the surrounding stars which the seem to cannibalize, to eventually become a light emitting sun again, and, repeat the process (for lack of a better anology, birth, light giving sun, super giant phase, collapse into a "black hole" ad infinitum....?

Actually, that's a bit backwards, but understandably.  As a black hole gains mass, it becomes a larger and more powerful black hole.

There is a theory that a black hole starved of matter to absorb would continue to give off high-energy emissions called Hawking radiation, and eventually lose mass due to this.  As it loses mass, the extreme gravity-well around it would dissipate, and eventually the space would return to a near-normal curve again.

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010703a.html
Retrospector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 229

I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2004, 10:06:38 AM »

There is a lot to be said about this subject, but here are a few comments. I don't pretend to be an astrophysicist myself!

This site has some numbers. A neutron star is thought to be in general the remnant of the core of a massive star whose atoms have collapsed into a packed mass of neutrons, likely following a supernova explosion. But there is an upper limit on the mass that can go into a neutron star.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/pulsar.html

Quote
For a sufficiently massive star, an iron core is formed and still the gravitational collapse has enough energy to heat it up to a high enough temperature to either fuse or fission iron. Either in the aftermath of a supernova or in just a collapsing massive star, the energy gets high enough to break down the iron into alpha particles and other smaller units, and still the pressure continues to build. When it reaches the threshold of energy necessary to force the combining of electrons and protons to form neutrons, the electron degeneracy limit has been passed and the collapse continues until it is stopped by neutron degeneracy. At this point it appears that the collapse will stop for stars with mass less than two or three solar masses, and the resulting collection of neutrons is called a neutron star. The periodic emitters called pulsars are thought to be neutron stars.

If the mass exceeds about three solar masses, then even neutron degeneracy will not stop the collapse, and the core shrinks toward the black hole condition.
The collapsing mass shrinks below the Schwarzshild radius, after which (in the General Relativity picture) light cannot escape from it.
alokmohan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 355


« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2004, 03:02:47 AM »

Neutron stars ar dead bodies of large stars if after they throw away the supenova and even then manages to have more than 1.4 times the mass of sun ,called chanrashekar limit.If it ismore than three suns after becominga netron star the poor chap is condemnedto be black hole.
remcook
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4338


hopeless ES addict


WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2004, 08:40:34 AM »

XMM Newton finds a spot on a neutron star:

http://www.esa.int/esaSC/Pr_15_2004_s_en.html
alokmohan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 355


« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2004, 01:45:39 AM »

What  UNRDESTAND IS BOTH xRAYS AND GAMMA RAYS ARE EMITTED.Whats special I fail to understand.
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5781


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2004, 06:08:47 AM »

X-rays and gamma rays are both electromagnetic radiation, i.e. photons.  X-rays tend to be of lower energy.

X-rays are formed by the emission of photons when electrons fall back into orbit about an atom and reflect the characteristic energies of the elements atoms.

Gamma rays are formed from nuclear reactions (such as decay of an excited nucleus) and reactions invovling subatomic particles.
alokmohan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 355


« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2004, 02:22:24 AM »

Can you say if there is anything special in Geminga in the sense of known astronomical object of past?Or it is new discovery?
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.308 seconds with 22 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.