banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Science Everything Archaeology Anthropology Humans went out of Africa for shellfish
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 08, 2008, 01:53:29 PM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
August 08, 2008, 01:53:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Humans went out of Africa for shellfish  (Read 2625 times)
Orstio
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5850



WWW
« on: May 16, 2005, 05:28:31 PM »

http://www.everything-science.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=135&Itemid=1
Quote
The lure of a seafood diet may explain why early humans came out of Africa, according to research by the universities of Leeds and Glasgow published in Science this week.

Early modern humans in East Africa survived on an inland diet based on big game but by 70,000 years ago their diet had changed to a coastal one consisting largely of shellfish. However, dramatic climate change seems likely to have reduced the Red Sea's shellfish stocks. New DNA evidence suggests their taste for life beside the sea caused them to set off from Africa to find new, better fishing grounds.

The international project shows – contrary to previous thinking – that early modern humans spread across the Red Sea from the Horn of Africa, along the tropical coast of the Indian Ocean towards the Pacific, in just a few thousand years.

Leeds biologist Dr Martin Richards said: What’s more, those early settlers were the ancestors of all non-Africans alive today - including modern Europ. . .
Retrospector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 229

I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2005, 01:57:41 AM »

I've followed this business for a long time. The debate goes on and on centering on two main theories-the "recently out of Africa" idea and the idea that modern humans evolved worldwide in a diverse multiregional fashion following much earlier migrations from Africa. Here's a short aricle from the National Geographic site.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/01/0111origins.html

Quote
Opposition to this theory comes from multiregionalists, anthropologists who see modern man arising from "a process of change within a species," said one of the theory’s architects, Milford Wolpoff.

Multiregionalists see modern humans arising from these changes in Africa, Eurasia, and Australia. The species that evolved, they say, gained traits held by all modern humans but remained racially diverse because of geographical adaptations and the distances between populations.

The modern traits were shared species-wide through interbreeding, maintains Wolpoff.

"The [Homo sapiens’] genes spread widely and were successful," he explained.

Wolpoff also argues for a much earlier date for the evolution of Homo sapiens than Out of Africa theorists postulate.

"There’s only been one species for a long time," he said.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.135 seconds with 22 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.