I've followed this business for a long time. The debate goes on and on centering on two main theories-the "recently out of Africa" idea and the idea that modern humans evolved worldwide in a diverse multiregional fashion following much earlier migrations from Africa. Here's a short aricle from the
National Geographic site.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/01/0111origins.htmlOpposition to this theory comes from multiregionalists, anthropologists who see modern man arising from "a process of change within a species," said one of the theory’s architects, Milford Wolpoff.
Multiregionalists see modern humans arising from these changes in Africa, Eurasia, and Australia. The species that evolved, they say, gained traits held by all modern humans but remained racially diverse because of geographical adaptations and the distances between populations.
The modern traits were shared species-wide through interbreeding, maintains Wolpoff.
"The [Homo sapiens’] genes spread widely and were successful," he explained.
Wolpoff also argues for a much earlier date for the evolution of Homo sapiens than Out of Africa theorists postulate.
"There’s only been one species for a long time," he said.