banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Science Everything Physical Science Physics Mark McCutcheon's Book - Final Theory - Chapter 1 for review
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 02, 2008, 10:40:12 PM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
December 02, 2008, 10:40:12 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Mark McCutcheon's Book - Final Theory - Chapter 1 for review  (Read 1463 times)
Bikerman
Bikerman, High Speed Philosophy a speciality
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 37


Atheist, biker, ID-Baiter


« on: January 12, 2006, 06:16:01 PM »

OK folks - here's a link to the Final Theory by Mark McCutcheon Chapter 1
He reckons physics is wrong and he has the GUT sorted....comments welcome.  Personally I think he's a nut and his physics is screwy but you judge for yourselves.  This chapter is freely downloaded from his website but to protect Astro/Orstio and this site from any potential silliness I've stuck it on my homepage and linked to it....happy reviewing. I should say the book is on Amazon and got a ***** review....hmmmmmmm


HTML format here  : http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~snowdonc/FinalTheory.htm

PDF format here    : http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~snowdonc/FinalTheory.pdf

Sorted - use PDF for preference, html version has a few graphic glitches

Chris.
Orstio
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5854



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2006, 06:29:29 PM »

This is where it all unravels:

Quote
However, this is only a proposed solution since the actual speed of gravity is unknown – no direct tests have been done to determine it.

The speed of gravity was measured in September 2002, and it is, (you guessed it!) the speed of light.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3232
Bikerman
Bikerman, High Speed Philosophy a speciality
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 37


Atheist, biker, ID-Baiter


« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2006, 06:45:02 PM »

This is where it all unravels:

Quote
However, this is only a proposed solution since the actual speed of gravity is unknown – no direct tests have been done to determine it.

The speed of gravity was measured in September 2002, and it is, (you guessed it!) the speed of light.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3232

Ahh but this dude thinks gravity does not travel at c
Bikerman
Bikerman, High Speed Philosophy a speciality
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 37


Atheist, biker, ID-Baiter


« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2006, 06:50:32 PM »

I think a small prize for the first person to spot 5 errors in physics/logic would be the thing..
OK - I'll post a full page article of your choice on any subject, intelligently researched, to the first to spot 5. You could make me really work for this :)

Chris.
Sarah90
Special
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2928



« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2006, 03:25:31 AM »

Not I !   Just read the whole thing through.  Gasp !   ::)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.138 seconds with 23 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.