banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Science Everything Archaeology Anthropology Human, Chimp Ancestors May Have Mated, DNA Suggests
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2008, 02:03:18 PM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
November 20, 2008, 02:03:18 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Human, Chimp Ancestors May Have Mated, DNA Suggests  (Read 1683 times)
Orstio
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5854



WWW
« on: May 22, 2006, 12:54:49 PM »

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/humans-chimps.html

Early human ancestors and chimpanzee ancestors may have mated and produced offspring, according to a new DNA study.

The study suggests that the human and chimp lineages initially split off from a single ape species about ten million years ago. Later, early chimps and early human ancestors may have begun interbreeding, creating hybrids—and complicating and prolonging the evolutionary separation of the two lineages.


Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5781


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2006, 04:59:12 PM »

I read that!  I'm trying to think of an appropriate comment.  ;D

I'll have to read the details, but I have to wonder how they figured this out given how long ago this happened.
Orstio
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5854



WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2006, 05:13:03 PM »

I think it makes things like the appearance and extinction of the Australopithicene (sp?) more logical.  It also explains why chimpanzees' DNA is so close to our own, while species that should be closer (e.g. Neandertal) have far greater differences in DNA.
Retrospector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 229

I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2006, 09:40:19 AM »

There are really so many possibilities when you consider the likelihood that there may have been more than one species of Australopithicus existing at the same time at points during our evolutionary history. That may also have been true for the genus ancestral to chimpanzees. Some may have interbred, some may not have. It's a big puzzle, and we'll never have all the pieces in trying to reconstruct the picture.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 22 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.