banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Everything Space Astronomy Clubs and Events Ask an Astronomer 136199 Eris - not Xena
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2008, 04:25:00 PM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
November 20, 2008, 04:25:00 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 136199 Eris - not Xena  (Read 1249 times)
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5781


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« on: September 14, 2006, 08:32:17 PM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_planet#List_of_dwarf_planets

Quote
Eris (officially designated 136199 Eris), informally known by the nickname Xena, is the largest known dwarf planet in the solar system. Previously designated 2003 UB313, it was nicknamed "Xena" by its discoverers. A trans-Neptunian object (TNO), it orbits the Sun in a region of space known as the scattered disc accompanied by at least one moon, Dysnomia; the pair are currently the most distant known objects in the solar system. Mike Brown, who led the Mount Palomar-based discovery team, announced in April 2006 that the Hubble Telescope has measured Eris' diameter to be 2400 km, slightly larger than Pluto.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/136199_Eris

http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/special/08747.pdf

I would have preferred 'Xena'!

Retrospector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 229

I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2006, 05:18:06 AM »

Eventually they'll run out of names in the Greek and Roman pantheons. I guess the point of using such "dignified" names is that they've been around for millenia and can be expected to last a while longer, whereas pop culture names like "Xena" may be unknown in a generation. I don't know about Eris, mean goddess that she was, but I guess some alternative had to be found to "Xena".

There was another object that was tagged "Buffy", with an extremely high orbital inclination:

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060114/bob10.asp

I wonder if that one will be renamed shortly as well.
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5781


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2006, 05:46:01 AM »

Well, we still have the Norse gods and goddesses, then there are the Egyptian, Mayan, Toltec, Aztec, Inca, . . . . pantheons.  Well then there is the 33 million Hindu gods and godesses.  I think we are covered - maybe.  It all depends on how many objects there are in the asteroid belt, and the KB.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.134 seconds with 22 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.