banner1

Home arrow Forum arrow Everything Space Space Science and Astronomy Supernovae
Main Menu
Home
News
Links
Wiki
Search
Administrator
FAQ
Contact Us
Science Books
Register
Online Store
Science on the Web
Store - beta
Project Fork
Feature Sections
Encyclopedia Astronuc
ID Watch
Community Menu
Forum
Chat Room
Einstein@Home
Member Blogs
CB
CB User List
Login Form
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 07, 2009, 10:18:14 AM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Password reminder
Newsflash
Everything Science Forum
January 07, 2009, 10:18:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Supernovae  (Read 12761 times)
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5786


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #45 on: May 22, 2007, 04:19:36 PM »

I found a nice discussion of Supernovae on Talkorigins.org

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/supernova/

It addresses some of the matters mentioned in this thread.


And there are some interesting references with respect to Supernovae, cosmology and neutrinos here:

http://inpa.lbl.gov/INPA/candi.html

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/neutrinos.html

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week130.html
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5786


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #46 on: November 15, 2007, 09:28:03 PM »

Brightest Supernova May Reignite
New supernova mechanism would set off repeat explosions
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=brightest-supernova-may-reignite
Quote
A new type of ultrapowerful supernova discovered last year may blow its top again, according to a new study.
Researchers report that supernova 2006gy fits a model of star explosion that should have produced two flare-ups already and may culminate in a third before the star fizzles out. A second study proposes that the explosion might have come about from the marriage of multiple stars.
 
SN 2006gy first caught astronomers' eyes in September. Burning 100 times brighter than a typical supernova, it maintained full strength for an amazing three months, by which point most of its counterparts would have begun fading. Even eight months later it was as brilliant as a so-called type II supernova, the most common variety. The energy unleashed implied that the exploding star was a behemoth of at least 100 solar masses (suns).
 
To explain SN 2006gy's massive outburst, researchers invoked a competing mechanism called pair-instability, which theoretically kicks in for stars larger than 90 suns. In this scenario, dating to 1967, high-energy gamma rays inside the star convert into pairs of electrons and positrons, draining stellar energy that would normally help maintain its internal pressure, eventually leading to a premature collapse that liberates vast amounts of energy and light.  . . . .
alokmohan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 355


« Reply #47 on: January 06, 2008, 03:08:54 AM »

Can you  say  if  there  has  been supenova   recently?
Astronuc
Recalcitrant Heathen
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5786


Celestial Wanderer - Temporal Guardian


WWW
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2008, 08:41:14 AM »

Can you  say  if  there  has  been supenova   recently?
Yes - this page lists the latest supernovae.
http://www.rochesterastronomy.org/snimages/
It appears in the first week of 2008, there are at least two SN.  There are many more last month, and last year (2007).
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.239 seconds with 22 queries.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.